Field Fisher Waterhouse
rolodex.jpg

Employment Update

14 August 2009

In this update: Indirect discrimination – establishing a pool for comparison | EHRC consults on gender pay gap | FSA remuneration code of practice | Increase in minimum wage for apprentices | Encourage older people back to work | Half of businesses considering redundancies | Swine flu – minimal impact on business

 


 

Indirect discrimination – establishing a pool for comparison   


The Court of Appeal has confirmed that a pension scheme rule which excluded retired teachers who returned to work on a part-time basis, but not those who returned on a full-time basis, constituted indirect sex discrimination. The correct pool to determine whether the rule had a disproportionate impact on women consisted of members of the pension scheme who had returned to work after retirement, rather than the entire teaching profession.


In Somerset County Council and another v Pike, Mrs Pike was one of the claimants in a test case involving a group of 74 teachers. She claimed that the rules of the Teachers' Pension Scheme were indirectly discriminatory on the grounds of sex. Under the rules, a teacher who retired and returned to teaching full-time could rejoin the pension scheme. However, a teacher who retired and returned to teaching on a part-time basis could not rejoin the pension scheme. Mrs Pike claimed that this amounted to indirect sex discrimination because it disadvantaged a substantially higher proportion of women than men.


The Employment Tribunal held that the correct pool to determine whether the rule had a disproportionate impact should contain the entire teaching profession, as they were all potentially affected by the rule. Mrs Pike appealed to the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT), which held that the pool should exclude pre-retirement teachers and should only consist of members of the pension scheme who had returned to work after retirement. Those who had not retired had no advantage out of the post-retirement rule favouring full-time employees: it simply did not apply to them and they could only distort the view of the pool.


The Court of Appeal upheld the EAT's decision and reasoning in relation to the narrower pool. The Court of Appeal agreed with the comments made by Baroness Hale in Rutherford and another v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, that by adopting the entire teaching profession as the appropriate pool for comparison, the Employment Tribunal brought into the equation people who have no interest in the advantage or disadvantage in question. Although the Court of Appeal noted that there may not be a single suitable pool for every case, there was only one logical pool in this case. The case was remitted to the same Employment Tribunal to hear arguments on justification.


Back to the top

 

EHRC consults private and voluntary sector employers on gender pay gap


The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) has launched a consultation this week to identify the most appropriate way for private and voluntary sector employers with at least 250 staff to measure and report on their gender pay gap.


The EHRC believes that developing ways for employers to measure and report on their gender pay gap will be a crucial step towards reducing pay inequity by providing greater transparency. It is working closely with the business sector, including the Confederation of British Industry (CBI) and with the Trades Union Congress (TUC), to develop a consistent way to measure the gender pay difference in organisations.


The aim is to empower private and voluntary sector employers to report on a voluntary basis, but the Equality Bill does contain a reserve power which, if a future Secretary of State chose to use it, could lead to mandatory reporting if progress has not been made on a voluntary basis by 2013. Consultation closes on 28 October 2009.


Back to the top

 

 

 

 

FSA introduces remuneration code of practice


The Financial Services Authority (FSA) has introduced a new code that will require large banks, building societies and broker dealers in the UK to establish, implement and maintain remuneration policies consistent with effective risk management.


The new code is designed to achieve two objectives:

  • make boards focus more closely on ensuring that the total amount distributed by a firm is consistent with good risk management and sustainability

  • ensure that individual compensation practices provide the right incentives

It is not expected that firms will enter into contracts with individuals which provide guaranteed bonuses for more than one year. It is also expected that for senior employees two-thirds of bonuses will be spread over three years. Firms are expected to provide the FSA with a remuneration policy statement by the end of October. This will have to be signed off by remuneration committees and will enable the FSA to check compliance with the code. Non-compliant firms could face enforcement action.


Back to the top

 

 

 

Increase in minimum wage for apprentices


The statutory minimum wage for apprentices rose from £80 to £95 a week on 1 August 2009. Apprentices are exempt from the National Minimum Wage so must receive at least this minimum contractual payment. The rise is expected to benefit around 26,000 apprentices.


Back to the top

 

 

Support needed to encourage older people back to work  


Long-term unemployed older people are at risk of never working again unless tailored support is offered to help them back into work, according to a recent TUC report.


The report is based on findings from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA), which shows that unemployed people over 50 are ten times as likely to still be out of work after two years than back in work. The TUC notes that a period of long-term unemployment for an older person increases their chances of never working again and that this is particularly the case for men. For every year of unemployment, men are 24.3 per cent less likely to find work again. The TUC has called for Government programmes to be age-proofed and customised to meet the needs of the over-50s.


Back to the top

 

 

Half of businesses considering redundancies


One in two companies is considering or certain to make redundancies over the next six months, according to the latest British Chambers of Commerce (BCC) Monthly Business Survey.


The results from 450 companies across the UK also confirm that demand remains low, with not a single business reporting that they will increase stock holdings over the next three months. 1 in 2 businesses also do not see growth returning until the first half of 2010.


Back to the top

 

 

 

Swine flu – minimal impact on business


Swine flu is currently having little impact on businesses, according to a recent survey of UK bosses.


Based on a survey of 756 members of the Institute of Directors, 85% of directors said that their business is not being hugely disrupted by swine flu. Many of the companies surveyed have issued guidance notes outlining how their business should deal with such an outbreak. Some directors expressed dismay at a small minority of employees, who appear to be taking advantage of the general guidance that has been given by the authorities.


Back to the top

 

Subscribe


If you have received this update from a colleague and wish to receive it yourself on a fortnightly basis, just click here to subscribe.

 

The Employment and Pensions Group also provides a range of other value added services, in addition to the fortnightly employment update.

 

If you would like to receive any of our other services, simply click here, to indicate which service(s) you would like to receive and to confirm your contact details.

 

Printer friendly version

 

14 August 2009

Welcome to our fortnightly round-up of what's happening in employment law.
Where to find us
Employment and Pensions Group
Field Fisher Waterhouse LLP
35 Vine Street
London
EC3N 2AA
Tel: (0)20 7861 4000
Fax: (0)20 7488 0084
www.ffw.com




To unsubscribe visit: http://info.ffw.com/vtu/ZZhUh98B84BP9465J59

This e-mail/publication is provided for information purposes only and is not a substitute for detailed advice on specific transactions and should not be taken as providing legal advice on any of the topics discussed, nor should it be taken as creating a solicitor-client relationship between the reader and Field Fisher Waterhouse LLP.

Please note that where this email/publication contains links to pages/items on third party websites, while such information may be available to be viewed and downloaded, this is subject always to the terms and conditions applicable to the particular website(s). Field Fisher Waterhouse LLP is not responsible for the content or operation of third party websites.

Copyright Field Fisher Waterhouse LLP 2009. All rights reserved.